<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chick Literate &#187; Chick lit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/tag/chick-lit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate</link>
	<description>Confessions of a chick lit fanatic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Melissa Nathan Award for Comedy Romance</title>
		<link>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/melissa-nathan-award.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/melissa-nathan-award.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lklawless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chick lit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think chick lit is dead, think again &#8211; the Melissa Nathan Award for Comedy Romance, held for the first time in 2007 and the second just a few days ago, could almost be called the Chick Lit Award. I think it&#8217;s great &#8211; tons of people (women and men) read these books, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think chick lit is dead, think again &#8211; the <a href="http://www.melissanathan.com/Award"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Melissa Nathan Award for Comedy Romance</a>, held for the first time in 2007 and the second just a few days ago, could almost be called the Chick Lit Award. I think it&#8217;s great &#8211; tons of people (women and men) read these books, and award shows are a great way to let us know about some of the best. My only complaint is that it&#8217;s limited to British authors. While I agree that chick lit was born in the UK and many of the best books are British, there are one or two good books published elsewhere. Why shouldn&#8217;t they be recognized? I guess it&#8217;s up to me to make sure you know about good chick lit no matter where it&#8217;s published with my <a href="http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/heart-awards">Chick Literate Heart Awards<a>. <img src='http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/Phoenity/smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/melissa-nathan-award.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is chick lit?</title>
		<link>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/what-is-chick-lit.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/what-is-chick-lit.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lklawless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chick lit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s kind of hard to define chick lit. The early books, like Bridget Jones&#8217;s Diary and Watermelon, tended to be light-hearted. The women might be flawed and undergo some traumatic events, but they usually had a pretty good sense of humor about it all. These are the books I adore.
The phenomenal success of Helen Fielding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of hard to define chick lit. The early books, like <i>Bridget Jones&#8217;s Diary</i> and <i>Watermelon</i>, tended to be light-hearted. The women might be flawed and undergo some traumatic events, but they usually had a pretty good sense of humor about it all. These are the books I adore.</p>
<p>The phenomenal success of Helen Fielding and Marian Keyes inspired more and more authors, which led to lots more good books and many bad ones. It also made the genre more complex, and unfortunately, chick lit has become a pretty generic term for virtually all fiction written by and for women since about 1996.* <span id="more-6"></span>Harlequin romance-type books are a notable exception: they came long before and are completely different from chick lit and never the twain should meet.</p>
<p>Chick lit can cover a huge range of topics. I personally prefer light-hearted chick lit &#8211; the stuff that&#8217;s funny and fun, with the occasional bizarre adventure or dilemma, and sex (if any) that&#8217;s not of the &#8220;heaving bosoms and throbbing manhood&#8221; variety. But there are plenty of really superficial chick lit novels that deal almost entirely with shopping or fashion (e.g., Sophie Kinsella&#8217;s books), for example, or that have completely unrealistic characters (like <i>The Devil Wears Prada</i>). And at the other end of the spectrum, there are plenty of books that are more serious, like <i>The Girl&#8217;s Guide to Hunting and Fishing</i>, by Melissa Bank, and most of Anna Maxted&#8217;s novels. What do all of these have in common? They&#8217;re written by women and for women, the characters can be neurotic but they&#8217;re usually fun, and there&#8217;s usually a happy &#8211; though not fairy-tale &#8211; ending. The bottom line for me is that it&#8217;s a good book if I want to be friends with the characters and/or author.</p>
<p>*Unsurprisingly, some women find the term chick lit offensive when it&#8217;s applied to their books, feeling that it automatically means fluffy and mindless. And apparently publishers can contribute to this, according to <a href="http://www.trashionista.com/2008/06/joanna-kavenna.html"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Trashionista&#8217;s post on Joanna Kavenna</a>, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312427883/lkl-20"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Inglorius</a> &#8211; a book she does not consider chick lit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/what-is-chick-lit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chick lit fanatic</title>
		<link>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/chick-lit-fanatic.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/chick-lit-fanatic.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lklawless</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chick lit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve decided that I&#8217;m ready to share my most embarrassing secret with the world. I read all the time, but not literature, or New York Times bestsellers, or even Oprah&#8217;s book club selections. My favorite books are chick lit, and while they might not be intellectual or impressive, they&#8217;re funny and entertaining, and I can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided that I&#8217;m ready to share my most embarrassing secret with the world. I read all the time, but not literature, or <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestsellers"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">New York Times bestsellers</a>, or even <a href="http://www.oprah.com/books/books_landing.jhtml"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Oprah&#8217;s book club selections</a>. My favorite books are chick lit, and while they might not be intellectual or impressive, they&#8217;re funny and entertaining, and I can&#8217;t get enough of them. I know there must be others out there like me, so say it with me. <i>I&#8217;m a chick lit fanatic, and proud of it!</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lklawless.com/chickliterate/chick-lit-fanatic.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

